Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA): The Annual Training You Click Through Could Cost You Your Job, What FWA Actually Means in a Pharmacy.

You probably click through your annual Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) training between rushes. In pharmacy, that habit can cost you your job. FWA is not just a compliance acronym. It’s how payers, regulators, and auditors judge the daily decisions you make at the bench. Understanding what counts as fraud, what’s “only” abuse, and how waste happens in real life helps you avoid audit findings, chargebacks, and license trouble. This guide explains what FWA actually looks like in a pharmacy—and how to protect yourself and your patients.

What FWA Means in a Pharmacy

Fraud is an intentional act to get paid for something you shouldn’t. Example: billing for a medication never dispensed. Why it matters: intent triggers the harshest penalties, including criminal charges, exclusion from federal programs, and license action.

Waste is careless use of resources. Example: stockpiling expensive drugs that expire on the shelf, or filling a 90-day supply when the therapy often changes at 30 days. Why it matters: payers view waste as poor stewardship of funds and a sign your controls are weak.

Abuse is using services in a way that doesn’t follow accepted practices. Example: routinely early-refilling without clinical need. Why it matters: abuse may lack intent, but payers still demand repayments and sanctions because it inflates costs and enables misuse.

Who enforces this? PBMs through audits and network rules, CMS for Medicare/Medicaid, state boards for practice standards, and the OIG/Department of Justice for fraud cases. Why so many eyes? Pharmacy claims move billions of public dollars. Auditors assume patterns tell the truth, even when people don’t.

Common Pharmacy Scenarios That Trigger FWA Findings

  • Billing for meds not dispensed: Auto-refilling chronic meds and billing without pickup or delivery confirmation. Why risky: auditors match claim dates to signature logs and delivery manifests. No proof of patient receipt = payback.
  • Early refills and overlapping days’ supply: “Patient is going on vacation” without documented approval or payer override. Why risky: patterns of early fills suggest diversion or stockpiling. Use vacation/LOE codes only with notes and prescriber or plan authorization.
  • DAW code misuse: Marking DAW 1 to bill brand at higher reimbursement when the prescriber didn’t specify brand medically necessary. Why risky: payers analyze DAW outliers; wrong DAW is treated as upcoding.
  • NDC mismatch billing: Filling from one NDC and billing another for better reimbursement. Why risky: PBMs require NDC-level accuracy to ensure correct pricing and rebate flow. Use the exact NDC dispensed or properly link equivalents per plan rules with documentation.
  • Copay waivers or routinely “zeroing out” copays: Doing it to be nice or hit adherence metrics. Why risky: routinely waiving cost-share is an inducement under federal rules. Waivers must be based on documented hardship and consistent policy, not marketing or convenience.
  • Manufacturer coupons on federal programs: Applying coupons to Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE. Why risky: federal beneficiaries cannot use manufacturer assistance for covered drugs. Auditors look for coupon logs and BIN/PCN patterns.
  • Splitting prescriptions: Billing multiple smaller fills to collect more dispensing fees (e.g., two 15-day supplies instead of one 30 without clinical reason). Why risky: seen as unbundling to increase revenue.
  • Compounds without medical necessity: High-dollar compounds with weak indications, missing formulas, or ingredients not supported by evidence. Why risky: auditors require prescriber documentation, formula details, and proof of ingredient purchase.
  • Usual & Customary (U&C) manipulation: Charging cash patients less than the U&C on file but billing payers the higher amount. Why risky: payers expect to pay at or below your true U&C; discrepancies trigger refunds.
  • Coordination of Benefits (COB) gaming: Billing secondary as primary to avoid rejections, or flipping primaries without documentation. Why risky: sequencing matters; payers verify primacy and patient coverage.
  • Immunizations and tests miscoding: Wrong CPT/NDC, missing consent or VIS dates, or billing without administration. Why risky: simple to audit; missing documentation creates obvious overpayment.
  • LTC and short-cycle rules: Billing 30 days when facility or payer requires 14-day cycles. Why risky: payers expect reduced waste in LTC; wrong days’ supply leads to recoupments.
  • Delivery and signature gaps: No proof of delivery for shipped meds, or signatures dated before claim adjudication. Why risky: chain of custody is central to payment. If you can’t show it, you didn’t dispense it.
  • Controlled substance red flags ignored: Multiple prescribers, distant patients, high-dose combos, cash patterns, or forged scripts. Why risky: regulators use these red flags to judge due diligence. Lack of PDMP checks and prescriber verification is indefensible.

The Gray Areas That Get People Fired

Intent is not the only test. Recklessness and willful blindness count. Saying “I was helping the patient” won’t fix patterns like backdating fills, adding refills not authorized, or using a generic NPI when the prescriber cannot prescribe that drug or schedule.

Metrics pressure is not a defense. When adherence targets conflict with rules, compliance wins. Auditors don’t care that your bonus relied on refill rates.

Documentation determines reality. If an override made clinical sense, but you didn’t record the drug interaction assessment or prescriber consult, the payer sees an unsupported override. No note = no justification.

How Audits Find Issues (And What They Look For)

Desk audits request copies of prescriptions, e-scripts, DUR notes, signature logs, compounding worksheets, delivery records, and invoices. Auditors compare claim data to your documents and inventory.

Onsite audits verify inventory on hand vs. claims billed. They do a three-way match: invoices, dispensing logs with NDC/lot, and claim details. They sample high-risk categories: controls, DAW brand claims, compounds, specialty meds, vaccines, and coupons.

They also analyze patterns: excessive early refills, outlier DAW codes, brand/generic ratios, high-cost NDC usage, LTC billing anomalies, and missing signatures. Patterns drive extrapolated paybacks, so a few bad files can become a big dollar problem.

What You Must Document, Every Time

  • Prescription validity: Correct patient, drug, strength, directions, quantity, refills, prescriber identity and authority, and date. For controls, ensure DEA validity and state-specific elements.
  • NDC dispensed: Match the billed NDC. Record lot and expiration when required (vaccines, certain recalls, compounding).
  • Days’ supply math: Show calculation for inhalers, insulin, eye drops, and PRN meds. Why: auditors disallow “rounded guesses.”
  • DUR/clinical notes: Document interactions resolved, therapeutic duplications assessed, and prescriber communications. Include date, time, initials.
  • Overrides and approvals: Prior auth numbers, vacation/LOE overrides, quantity limit approvals, copay hardship documentation per policy.
  • Pick-up/delivery proof: Signature logs or carrier tracking with date/time, address, and recipient. For LTC, follow facility MAR and receipt protocols.
  • Compounds: Formula, calculations, beyond-use date justification, ingredients NDCs, lot numbers, and cost invoices.
  • COB details: Which plan was primary, what paid, and why secondary was billed. Keep EOB/claim prints as needed.
  • Coupon/copay assistance: Program terms and proof it wasn’t used on federal plans.

Practical Safeguards for Pharmacists and Technicians

  • Verify prescribers: Check DEA/state scope, especially for controls and telehealth. If it feels off, call to confirm.
  • Use exact NDCs: Scan from the stock bottle. Update claim if you substitute a different NDC before you bag it.
  • Hold-to-pickup discipline: Reverse claims not picked up within policy (e.g., 7–14 days). Return to stock and document reversals.
  • Calculate days’ supply explicitly: Save the math in the profile for non-tablet forms.
  • Run PDMP and document red-flag resolution: Note prescriber conversation or clinical rationale before dispensing.
  • Apply copay waivers only per policy: Require documented hardship. Do not advertise waivers.
  • Use partial fills correctly: For supply shortages, bill a partial with correct quantity and reverse/complete when finished. Don’t “short” and bill full.
  • Keep delivery clean: Use tamper-evident packaging, verified addresses, and carrier tracking. No signatures, no payment.
  • Train and audit your own team: Quick weekly spot checks catch mistakes before PBMs do.

What To Do When Someone Asks You To Do the Wrong Thing

Scripts you can use:

  • “I can’t bill that DAW code without the prescriber specifying brand medically necessary. I’ll call for clarification.”
  • “We need plan approval for that early refill. Let’s request a vacation override or coordinate with the prescriber.”
  • “Federal rules don’t allow coupons on Medicare. I can show you lower-cost alternatives or talk to your doctor.”

If pressure persists, escalate to your pharmacist-in-charge, compliance officer, or corporate hotline. Document your concern and the guidance you receive. Why: good-faith reporting is protected in many settings, and your notes show you acted responsibly.

Real-World Mini Case Studies

  • DAW 1 “because patient asked”: Tech selected DAW 1 to keep brand for a statin. Audit matched e-script without DAW and found no prescriber note. Result: $18,000 recoupment on all similar claims, tech retraining, pharmacist final warning. Why: patient preference isn’t DAW 1.
  • Routinely waiving $5 copays: Store manager told staff to waive small copays to improve adherence scores. PBM saw copay rates far below peers. Result: network sanction and repayments. Why: routine waivers are inducements, regardless of amount.
  • Early refills for travel without notes: Pharmacist okayed “vacation fills” verbally. No documentation, no plan overrides. Audit used overlapping days’ supply to deny. Result: $7,400 recouped. Why: no approved override or clinical record.

Consequences: The Risk to You Personally

  • Employment: Termination for policy violations or audit losses linked to your initials.
  • Licensure: Board discipline for unprofessional conduct or inadequate supervision/documentation.
  • Civil and criminal exposure: For intentional acts or kickback/inducement behavior.
  • Exclusion from federal programs: Ends many pharmacy careers; employers routinely screen for exclusions.

Why so severe? Payers and regulators assume professionals know the rules. Your documentation is your defense. If it isn’t in the record, it didn’t happen.

A Quick FWA Checklist for Each Prescription

  • Is the prescription valid and complete for this drug and schedule?
  • Did I verify the prescriber and, if needed, check PDMP?
  • Does the billed NDC match the product in the bottle?
  • Is the days’ supply calculation correct and saved?
  • Are any overrides (PA, vacation, quantity limit) documented?
  • Is there proof of counseling offer and pick-up/delivery?
  • For compounds: do I have formula, ingredients, and lot numbers?
  • For coupons/copay help: am I sure this is not a federal plan?
  • If it feels off, did I pause and document the resolution?

Take the Training Seriously—It Pays Off

FWA rules aren’t arbitrary. They exist because small errors at scale drain money and enable harm. In pharmacy, your initials carry legal weight. When you understand why DAW codes matter, why signatures are non-negotiable, and why documentation must be specific, you prevent chargebacks, protect your license, and serve patients better. The annual module you usually click through is a map of risks you face every day. Read it like your job depends on it—because it does.

Leave a Comment

PRO
Ad-Free Access
$3.99 / month
  • No Interruptions
  • Faster Page Loads
  • Support Content Creators