Introduction: Substructure manipulation and annealing are key computational strategies in modern drug design that enable M. Pharm students to explore, optimize and generate novel chemical entities. Substructure manipulation covers methods for identifying, editing and replacing molecular fragments—such as scaffolds, rings, and functional groups—using SMARTS, fingerprints, and maximum common substructure algorithms. Annealing, particularly simulated annealing and related stochastic optimization techniques, helps find low-energy conformations or optimal substructure arrangements by probabilistic sampling guided by a temperature schedule. This quiz set focuses on both theoretical principles and practical applications—searching, matching, fragment-based design, energy landscapes, and algorithmic considerations—tailored to the M. Pharm curriculum.
Q1. What is the primary purpose of substructure searching in drug discovery?
- To predict pharmacokinetic parameters directly from a molecule
- To identify molecules containing a specific functional fragment or motif
- To calculate absolute binding free energy of a ligand
- To model protein folding pathways
Correct Answer: To identify molecules containing a specific functional fragment or motif
Q2. Which language/pattern syntax is commonly used to define chemical substructures for searching and matching?
- SMILES
- SMARTS
- InChI
- XML
Correct Answer: SMARTS
Q3. In maximum common substructure (MCS) algorithms, what is typically optimized?
- The lowest energy conformation shared by two molecules
- The largest subgraph (set of atoms/bonds) that two molecules share
- The highest scoring docking pose
- The most synthetically accessible retrosynthetic pathway
Correct Answer: The largest subgraph (set of atoms/bonds) that two molecules share
Q4. Which fingerprint type is most appropriate for fast substructure presence/absence screening?
- 2D hashed structural fingerprints (e.g., Morgan/ECFP)
- 3D pharmacophore fingerprints
- Quantum mechanical descriptors
- SMILES canonicalization fingerprints
Correct Answer: 2D hashed structural fingerprints (e.g., Morgan/ECFP)
Q5. What does “scaffold hopping” refer to in medicinal chemistry?
- Replacing a protein scaffold to change folding
- Changing the core structure of a lead molecule while retaining activity
- Moving a substituent from one position to another on the same ring
- Optimizing ADME properties by prodrug design
Correct Answer: Changing the core structure of a lead molecule while retaining activity
Q6. In simulated annealing, what is the role of the “temperature” parameter?
- Determines the number of Monte Carlo steps per iteration
- Controls the probability of accepting higher-energy (worse) moves
- Specifies the target energy to reach at the end
- Represents the physical temperature required for synthesis
Correct Answer: Controls the probability of accepting higher-energy (worse) moves
Q7. Which acceptance criterion is most commonly used in simulated annealing algorithms?
- Bayesian information criterion (BIC)
- Metropolis criterion
- Levenberg–Marquardt rule
- Chi-squared test
Correct Answer: Metropolis criterion
Q8. For substructure replacement during fragment-based design, which factor is least important to consider?
- Geometric compatibility at attachment points
- Preservation of key pharmacophores
- Availability of the fragment in vendor libraries
- Change in ligand solubility and polarity
Correct Answer: Availability of the fragment in vendor libraries
Q9. Which of the following best describes “matched molecular pairs” (MMPs) analysis?
- Comparing two proteins bound to the same ligand
- Analyzing pairs of molecules differing only by a single defined transformation
- Pairing ligands and receptors by docking score
- Matching molecules to synthetic routes
Correct Answer: Analyzing pairs of molecules differing only by a single defined transformation
Q10. What is a common cooling schedule used in simulated annealing?
- Instantaneous quenching
- Exponential (geometric) cooling
- Increasing temperature linearly
- Random temperature jumps with no schedule
Correct Answer: Exponential (geometric) cooling
Q11. In substructure matching, what is the main challenge solved by using atom mapping during replacements?
- Predicting ADME/Tox properties post-replacement
- Ensuring bond order and connectivity consistency across the replacement boundary
- Calculating exact quantum energies of new fragments
- Automatically generating synthetic routes
Correct Answer: Ensuring bond order and connectivity consistency across the replacement boundary
Q12. Which application uses simulated annealing to sample conformations rather than 2D substructures?
- Pharmacophore fingerprinting
- 3D conformer generation and optimization
- Synthetic accessibility scoring
- SMARTS pattern compilation
Correct Answer: 3D conformer generation and optimization
Q13. Which metric is commonly used to prioritize substructure replacements for medicinal chemistry?
- Difference in experimental melting point
- Change in predicted binding affinity or computed score
- Number of synthetic steps alone
- Length of SMILES string
Correct Answer: Change in predicted binding affinity or computed score
Q14. When performing substructure enumeration, which constraint helps maintain drug-likeness?
- Unlimited ring counts to explore diversity
- Applying Lipinski-like filters and synthetic accessibility constraints
- Allowing arbitrary heavy atom counts without limits
- Permitting any unstable functional group
Correct Answer: Applying Lipinski-like filters and synthetic accessibility constraints
Q15. How does simulated annealing differ from a simple hill-climbing algorithm?
- Simulated annealing only accepts better moves
- Simulated annealing can accept worse moves with controlled probability to escape local minima
- Hill-climbing uses a temperature schedule to accept moves
- They are identical in behavior for global optimization
Correct Answer: Simulated annealing can accept worse moves with controlled probability to escape local minima
Q16. In the context of substructure-aware scoring, what is a “penalty term” typically used for?
- To reward molecules with more hydrogen bond donors
- To penalize features that increase toxicity or reduce synthetic feasibility
- To make scores independent of molecular weight
- To convert 2D representations into 3D
Correct Answer: To penalize features that increase toxicity or reduce synthetic feasibility
Q17. Which algorithmic strategy is often combined with annealing to propose chemical modifications in de novo design?
- Deterministic gradient descent on SMILES strings
- Monte Carlo moves that replace or mutate substructures
- Fourier transform of molecular graphs
- Direct enumeration of all possible molecules with no heuristics
Correct Answer: Monte Carlo moves that replace or mutate substructures
Q18. What is “conformational annealing” primarily aimed at in ligand modeling?
- Converting 2D SMARTS to SMILES
- Gradually exploring and optimizing 3D conformational space to find low-energy geometries
- Predicting pKa values of ionizable groups
- Aligning multiple sequence alignments
Correct Answer: Gradually exploring and optimizing 3D conformational space to find low-energy geometries
Q19. Which of the following is a typical stopping criterion for a simulated annealing run?
- When the temperature has reached a predefined minimum and no improvements for many iterations
- After exactly one Monte Carlo step
- When the algorithm reaches the first local minimum regardless of temperature
- Only when the user manually halts the process
Correct Answer: When the temperature has reached a predefined minimum and no improvements for many iterations
Q20. In substructure manipulation workflows, why is maintaining valence and aromaticity rules important during replacements?
- To ensure the SMILES strings remain short
- To prevent generation of chemically impossible or highly unstable molecules
- To force all molecules into a single conformation
- To make molecules more hydrophobic
Correct Answer: To prevent generation of chemically impossible or highly unstable molecules

I am a Registered Pharmacist under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, and the founder of PharmacyFreak.com. I hold a Bachelor of Pharmacy degree from Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Science and Research. With a strong academic foundation and practical knowledge, I am committed to providing accurate, easy-to-understand content to support pharmacy students and professionals. My aim is to make complex pharmaceutical concepts accessible and useful for real-world application.
Mail- Sachin@pharmacyfreak.com

