Introduction
Non-parametric tests are essential tools in biostatistics when data do not meet parametric assumptions such as normality or homogeneity of variance. This set of MCQs focuses on two widely used non-parametric methods in M.Pharm research: the Wilcoxon tests (signed-rank and rank-sum/Mann–Whitney) and the Chi-square family of tests (goodness-of-fit and tests of independence). The questions emphasize conceptual understanding, appropriate test selection, computation of test statistics, handling ties and zero differences, continuity corrections, degrees of freedom, and interpretation in contingency tables. These items are designed to prepare you for exam questions and practical data analysis decisions in pharmaceutical research.
Q1. Which situation is most appropriate for using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test?
- Comparing means of two independent normally distributed groups
- Comparing paired measurements when differences are not normally distributed
- Assessing association between two categorical variables in a 2×2 table
- Testing the goodness-of-fit for a single categorical variable
Correct Answer: Comparing paired measurements when differences are not normally distributed
Q2. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test (Mann–Whitney U) is best described as:
- A parametric test comparing paired samples
- A non-parametric test comparing two independent samples using ranks
- A test for homogeneity of variances
- A test for trend across ordered categories
Correct Answer: A non-parametric test comparing two independent samples using ranks
Q3. In the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, how are zero differences (ties at zero) commonly handled?
- They are assigned the average rank and included in the test statistic
- They are excluded from ranking and reduce the effective sample size
- They are converted to small positive values and kept
- They force the use of a parametric paired t-test instead
Correct Answer: They are excluded from ranking and reduce the effective sample size
Q4. Which assumption is NOT required for the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test?
- Observations from the two groups are independent
- The two distributions have the same shape under the null
- The measurements are at least ordinal
- The samples must be of equal size
Correct Answer: The samples must be of equal size
Q5. For a 2×2 contingency table with small expected counts (<5 in any cell), which test is preferred over the Pearson Chi-square?
- Linear regression
- Wilcoxon signed-rank test
- Fisher’s exact test
- Mann–Whitney U test
Correct Answer: Fisher’s exact test
Q6. The Pearson Chi-square test for independence in a contingency table uses expected counts calculated from:
- Row totals only
- Column totals only
- The product of corresponding row and column totals divided by the grand total
- Sample variances of each cell
Correct Answer: The product of corresponding row and column totals divided by the grand total
Q7. Which of the following statements about the Wilcoxon signed-rank test statistic is TRUE?
- It compares sums of squared deviations from the median
- It is based on the signed ranks of differences between paired observations
- It requires normally distributed differences to be valid
- It uses contingency table counts to compute the statistic
Correct Answer: It is based on the signed ranks of differences between paired observations
Q8. When using Pearson Chi-square for goodness-of-fit, degrees of freedom are calculated as:
- Number of categories minus 1 minus number of estimated parameters
- Total sample size minus number of categories
- Number of categories multiplied by number of parameters
- Always equal to 1 for goodness-of-fit
Correct Answer: Number of categories minus 1 minus number of estimated parameters
Q9. In a 3×4 contingency table, how many degrees of freedom are used for the Pearson Chi-square test of independence?
- 3
- 6
- 8
- 12
Correct Answer: 6
Q10. Which adjustment is applied to the Pearson Chi-square statistic in a 2×2 table to improve approximation for small samples?
- Bonferroni correction
- Yates continuity correction
- Holm correction
- Fisher–Neyman correction
Correct Answer: Yates continuity correction
Q11. A researcher has paired pre- and post-treatment pain scores on an ordinal scale for 15 patients. Which test is most appropriate?
- Two-sample t-test
- Wilcoxon signed-rank test
- Mann–Whitney U test
- Pearson Chi-square test
Correct Answer: Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Q12. For the Mann–Whitney U test, a large U value corresponds to which outcome when comparing group A to group B?
- Group A has consistently larger ranks than group B
- Group A has consistently smaller ranks than group B
- There is no difference in rank distributions
- The test is invalid when U is large
Correct Answer: Group A has consistently larger ranks than group B
Q13. In Chi-square tests, standardized residuals help to:
- Determine which cells contribute most to a significant overall Chi-square
- Transform ordinal data to nominal
- Compute sample size for Wilcoxon tests
- Estimate effect size for Mann–Whitney U
Correct Answer: Determine which cells contribute most to a significant overall Chi-square
Q14. When ties are present in data for the Mann–Whitney U test, what is the recommended approach?
- Ignore ties; they do not affect the test
- Use a tie correction in the variance formula or use exact methods
- Convert tied values randomly to break ties
- Switch to a parametric t-test instead
Correct Answer: Use a tie correction in the variance formula or use exact methods
Q15. The null hypothesis for Pearson Chi-square test of independence states:
- Variables are linearly correlated
- Variables are independent (no association)
- The marginal totals are equal
- Row proportions equal column proportions exactly
Correct Answer: Variables are independent (no association)
Q16. In Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the test statistic is commonly compared to:
- A t-distribution critical value
- Theoretical critical values from Wilcoxon distribution or normal approximation for large samples
- The F-distribution
- The binomial distribution exclusively
Correct Answer: Theoretical critical values from Wilcoxon distribution or normal approximation for large samples
Q17. Which measure is an appropriate effect size for the Mann–Whitney U or Wilcoxon tests?
- Cohen’s d only
- Rank-biserial correlation or r (z/sqrt(N))
- Adjusted R-squared
- Hazard ratio
Correct Answer: Rank-biserial correlation or r (z/sqrt(N))
Q18. If expected frequencies in a contingency table are adequate, which property makes Pearson Chi-square test a large-sample test?
- It uses ranks instead of raw data
- Its sampling distribution approaches the Chi-square distribution with increasing sample size
- It estimates medians rather than means
- It requires normally distributed categorical data
Correct Answer: Its sampling distribution approaches the Chi-square distribution with increasing sample size
Q19. You want to test whether observed genotype frequencies match expected Hardy–Weinberg proportions. Which test is commonly used?
- Wilcoxon signed-rank test
- Pearson Chi-square goodness-of-fit test
- Mann–Whitney U test
- Paired t-test
Correct Answer: Pearson Chi-square goodness-of-fit test
Q20. When comparing more than two independent groups on an ordinal outcome, which non-parametric extension is appropriate instead of multiple pairwise Mann–Whitney tests?
- Kruskal–Wallis test
- Wilcoxon signed-rank test
- Pearson Chi-square test of independence
- Paired t-test
Correct Answer: Kruskal–Wallis test

I am a Registered Pharmacist under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, and the founder of PharmacyFreak.com. I hold a Bachelor of Pharmacy degree from Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Science and Research. With a strong academic foundation and practical knowledge, I am committed to providing accurate, easy-to-understand content to support pharmacy students and professionals. My aim is to make complex pharmaceutical concepts accessible and useful for real-world application.
Mail- Sachin@pharmacyfreak.com

