Adulterant screening using modern analytical instruments MCQs With Answer

Introduction: Adulterant screening using modern analytical instruments is an essential topic for M.Pharm students specializing in herbal and cosmetic analysis. This blog-style MCQ set focuses on the principles, sample preparation, instrumental techniques, and interpretation strategies used to detect adulterants—synthetic drugs, dyes, pesticides, heavy metals and other contaminants—in herbal and cosmetic matrices. Questions emphasize hyphenated techniques (GC-MS, LC-MS/MS), spectroscopic methods (FTIR, NMR, Raman, NIR), screening vs confirmatory workflows, chemometrics, method validation and practical sample-processing approaches like QuEChERS and SPE. These MCQs are crafted to deepen conceptual understanding and prepare students for laboratory application and regulatory compliance in adulterant screening.

Q1. Which technique is considered the most definitive confirmatory method for identifying unknown organic adulterants in herbal extracts due to its ability to provide molecular weight and structural information?

• High-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV)
• Gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID)
• Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
• Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

Correct Answer: Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Q2. Which sample preparation approach is widely used for multi-residue pesticide screening in plant matrices because it is fast, economical and compatible with GC and LC analysis?

• Soxhlet extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography
• QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe)
• Soxhlet extraction with hexane only
• Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) without cleanup

Correct Answer: QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe)

Q3. In screening for heavy metal adulterants in herbal products, which instrument provides the highest sensitivity and can quantify trace levels of multiple elements simultaneously?

• Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) with flame atomization
• Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)
• Ion chromatography (IC)
• UV-Visible spectrophotometry

Correct Answer: Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)

Q4. Which spectroscopic method is most appropriate for rapid, non-destructive fingerprint screening of powdered herbal samples and detection of organic adulterants using chemometric models?

• Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
• Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy
• Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
• ICP-MS

Correct Answer: Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy

Q5. For distinguishing isomeric synthetic adulterants with identical molecular weights in a herbal matrix, which analytical approach is most effective?

• Single-quadrupole LC with UV detection
• High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) with accurate mass and MS/MS fragmentation
• Simple TLC with a visible dye reagent
• FTIR in transmission mode

Correct Answer: High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) with accurate mass and MS/MS fragmentation

Q6. Which technique provides molecular functional group information and is frequently used as a rapid confirmatory tool for suspected adulterants in oils and creams?

• FTIR spectroscopy
• GC-FID
• LC-MS/MS
• X-ray diffraction (XRD)

Correct Answer: FTIR spectroscopy

Q7. Which hyphenated technique is preferentially used for volatile or semi-volatile adulterant profiling in herbal samples, providing chromatographic separation and mass spectral identification?

• HPLC-UV
• GC-MS
• ICP-OES
• FTIR-ATR

Correct Answer: GC-MS

Q8. In LC-MS/MS method validation for adulterant quantification, which parameter specifically measures the lowest concentration at which the analyte can be reliably quantified with acceptable precision and accuracy?

• Limit of detection (LOD)
• Linearity range
• Limit of quantification (LOQ)
• Specificity

Correct Answer: Limit of quantification (LOQ)

Q9. Which sample-cleanup cartridge is most suitable for removing lipids and pigments from complex herbal extracts prior to LC-MS analysis?

• C18 reversed-phase SPE
• Weak anion exchange (WAX) SPE
• Graphitized carbon black (GCB) SPE
• Silica gel normal phase SPE

Correct Answer: Graphitized carbon black (GCB) SPE

Q10. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is used in adulterant screening primarily because it offers which key advantage over conventional Raman?

• Complete elimination of fluorescence background in all samples
• Mass spectral fragmentation patterns for structural elucidation
• Large signal enhancement allowing trace-level detection on substrates
• Universal quantification without calibration

Correct Answer: Large signal enhancement allowing trace-level detection on substrates

Q11. Which of the following best describes a tiered screening-confirmatory workflow for detecting synthetic pharmaceuticals adulterating herbal supplements?

• Perform only TLC as it is sufficient for regulatory action
• Initial rapid screening (e.g., NIR, immunoassay, TLC) followed by confirmatory LC-MS/MS or GC-MS when positives are found
• Direct use of ICP-MS for all organic adulterants
• Use of sensory evaluation followed by HPLC-UV if suspicious

Correct Answer: Initial rapid screening (e.g., NIR, immunoassay, TLC) followed by confirmatory LC-MS/MS or GC-MS when positives are found

Q12. Matrix effects in LC-MS analysis of herbal extracts primarily refer to:

• Instrument drift over time
• Ion suppression or enhancement caused by co-eluting matrix components
• Poor chromatographic retention of analytes
• Degradation of analytes during storage

Correct Answer: Ion suppression or enhancement caused by co-eluting matrix components

Q13. Which approach improves specificity when screening for synthetic colorant adulterants in cosmetics using thin-layer chromatography (TLC)?

• Use of a single, low-polarity solvent system only
• Visualization under multiple detection modes (UV, visible staining reagents) and Rf comparison with standards
• Avoiding standards to prevent contamination
• Using TLC plates without any sample application for control

Correct Answer: Visualization under multiple detection modes (UV, visible staining reagents) and Rf comparison with standards

Q14. When screening for melamine adulteration in protein-rich herbal products, which analytical technique is commonly used for quantification due to its selectivity and sensitivity?

• Flame photometry
• LC-MS/MS after derivatization or appropriate ionization
• FTIR with ATR sampling without cleanup
• Visible spectrophotometry using ninhydrin

Correct Answer: LC-MS/MS after derivatization or appropriate ionization

Q15. Which chemometric method is typically used to classify spectral fingerprints (e.g., NIR or FTIR) of authentic versus adulterated herbal samples?

• Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)
• Simple moving average smoothing
• Manual peak picking without multivariate treatment
• pH titration curves

Correct Answer: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)

Q16. Which instrument is most useful for detecting crystalline inorganic adulterants (e.g., talc, silica) in cosmetic powders?

• Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
• X-ray diffraction (XRD)
• LC-MS/MS
• NIR spectroscopy

Correct Answer: X-ray diffraction (XRD)

Q17. In GC-MS analysis of herbal volatiles, which ion source property assists in generating reproducible fragmentation patterns for library matching?

• Use of cold-electron ionization (CEI)
• Electron ionization (EI) at standardized energy (e.g., 70 eV)
• Random ionization energies for each run
• Exclusive use of chemical ionization without libraries

Correct Answer: Electron ionization (EI) at standardized energy (e.g., 70 eV)

Q18. For rapid on-site screening of banned synthetic stimulants in herbal weight-loss products, which portable technique provides immediate presumptive identification?

• Portable Raman or handheld NIR with spectral libraries
• ICP-MS mobile lab
• Offline Soxhlet extraction followed by GC-MS in the field
• Paper chromatography only

Correct Answer: Portable Raman or handheld NIR with spectral libraries

Q19. Which statement about immunoassays (e.g., ELISA, lateral flow) used as screening tools for adulterants is correct?

• They are universally specific for all adulterants without cross-reactivity concerns
• They provide rapid screening but often require confirmatory analysis by instrumental methods due to possible false positives/negatives
• They replace the need for any chromatographic confirmation
• They are unsuitable for field use because they require high vacuum systems

Correct Answer: They provide rapid screening but often require confirmatory analysis by instrumental methods due to possible false positives/negatives

Q20. Which analytical consideration is most critical when developing a multi-analyte LC-MS/MS method for both polar and non-polar synthetic adulterants in complex herbal matrices?

• Using a single ionization mode without optimization
• Careful selection of chromatographic column chemistry, mobile phase composition, gradient, and ionization conditions to balance retention and sensitivity
• Eliminating sample cleanup to maximize throughput irrespective of matrix effects
• Choosing detectors based only on cost rather than analytical performance

Correct Answer: Careful selection of chromatographic column chemistry, mobile phase composition, gradient, and ionization conditions to balance retention and sensitivity

Download