Factors Affecting Resolution MCQs With Answer
Resolution is the cornerstone of reliable quantitation and identification in Modern Pharmaceutical Analytical Techniques. Whether you use HPLC, UHPLC, GC, CE, or UV-Vis, understanding how efficiency, selectivity, and retention interplay is vital for separating closely eluting analytes, stability-indicating methods, impurity profiling, and chiral analysis. This quiz dives into practical levers—particle size, column length, flow rate, temperature, pH, ionic strength, gradient slope, injection volume, extra-column effects, and detector settings—that directly affect resolution. Designed for M.Pharm students, the questions emphasize mechanism-based reasoning and method optimization choices you make at the bench. Use these MCQs to strengthen your grasp on why small changes in selectivity often beat brute-force increases in efficiency, and how to tune conditions for robust, high-resolution separations.
Q1. In chromatography, which set of parameters fundamentally determines resolution (Rs)?
- Efficiency (number of theoretical plates), selectivity (α), and retention factor (k’)
- Capacity factor, detector sensitivity, and injection volume
- Flow rate, sample polarity, and UV cut-off
- Column temperature, pump pulsation, and stationary-phase bleed
Correct Answer: Efficiency (number of theoretical plates), selectivity (α), and retention factor (k’)
Q2. If column length is doubled while keeping all other conditions identical, the resolution will approximately:
- Double
- Increase by the square root of 2
- Decrease by half
- Remain unchanged
Correct Answer: Increase by the square root of 2
Q3. Which change most directly improves column efficiency (N) and thus resolution, without intentionally changing selectivity?
- Decrease particle size from 5 µm to 3 µm
- Switch to a longer detection wavelength
- Increase injection volume
- Use a higher organic modifier percentage
Correct Answer: Decrease particle size from 5 µm to 3 µm
Q4. In isocratic RP-HPLC, which retention factor (k’) range generally provides the best practical resolution within reasonable analysis time?
- 0.2–0.8
- 1–2
- 2–10
- >15
Correct Answer: 2–10
Q5. For two peaks with poor separation, which strategy most effectively increases resolution by altering selectivity (α)?
- Change stationary-phase chemistry (e.g., C18 to phenyl-hexyl)
- Increase flow rate to the van Deemter minimum
- Increase column length by 25%
- Add a guard column of the same chemistry
Correct Answer: Change stationary-phase chemistry (e.g., C18 to phenyl-hexyl)
Q6. A weak acid (pKa = 4) in RP-HPLC is poorly resolved from its conjugate base. At which pH is higher retention and better resolution most likely?
- pH 2.5
- pH 4.0
- pH 6.0
- pH 8.0
Correct Answer: pH 2.5
Q7. Increasing column temperature from 25°C to 40°C in RP-HPLC (same mobile phase) tends to:
- Reduce mobile phase viscosity and plate height, potentially increasing resolution
- Increase k’ dramatically and lengthen the run substantially
- Always improve selectivity for isomers
- Cause cavitation and worsen peak shape in modern systems
Correct Answer: Reduce mobile phase viscosity and plate height, potentially increasing resolution
Q8. According to the van Deemter relationship, which statement about flow rate and resolution is most accurate?
- Operating at the flow that minimizes plate height yields maximal resolution
- Maximum resolution occurs at the highest achievable flow rate
- Resolution is independent of flow rate
- Doubling flow rate always doubles resolution
Correct Answer: Operating at the flow that minimizes plate height yields maximal resolution
Q9. Which practice most commonly degrades resolution for early-eluting peaks in RP-HPLC?
- Injecting the sample in a solvent stronger than the mobile phase
- Using longer column equilibration times
- Filtering samples through 0.2 µm membranes
- Maintaining column temperature with a column oven
Correct Answer: Injecting the sample in a solvent stronger than the mobile phase
Q10. Two peaks with α ≈ 1.02 coelute in an isocratic RP method. Which change is most likely to produce the largest resolution gain?
- Switching organic modifier type (e.g., acetonitrile to methanol) to alter selectivity
- Increasing flow rate by 20%
- Raising injection volume
- Extending total run time with a steeper gradient
Correct Answer: Switching organic modifier type (e.g., acetonitrile to methanol) to alter selectivity
Q11. To minimize extra-column band broadening in UHPLC and preserve resolution, the best approach is to:
- Use shorter, narrow-bore tubing and a low-volume detector cell
- Switch to larger-ID tubing to reduce backpressure
- Add a mixing tee between the column and detector
- Increase autosampler loop volume
Correct Answer: Use shorter, narrow-bore tubing and a low-volume detector cell
Q12. In ion-pair chromatography, adding an ion-pair reagent primarily improves resolution by modifying:
- Selectivity by changing effective analyte hydrophobicity
- Detector noise characteristics
- Pump pulsation amplitude
- Column temperature stability
Correct Answer: Selectivity by changing effective analyte hydrophobicity
Q13. In isothermal GC, lowering the oven temperature typically leads to which effect on resolution?
- Increased retention and potential selectivity enhancement, improving resolution but increasing run time
- Decreased retention and always improved resolution
- No effect on selectivity
- Increased detector noise without affecting resolution
Correct Answer: Increased retention and potential selectivity enhancement, improving resolution but increasing run time
Q14. For basic analytes on silica-based C18, increasing buffer concentration from 5 mM to 25 mM will most likely:
- Shield silanol interactions, reduce tailing, and improve resolution
- Increase mobile phase pH drastically
- Decrease system backpressure
- Degrade selectivity by ion-pairing with acidic species
Correct Answer: Shield silanol interactions, reduce tailing, and improve resolution
Q15. Injecting sample mass beyond the column’s linear capacity most commonly results in:
- Peak fronting or tailing and reduced resolution
- Sharper, symmetric peaks and improved resolution
- Increased number of theoretical plates
- Reduced backpressure and faster runs
Correct Answer: Peak fronting or tailing and reduced resolution
Q16. In capillary GC, increasing stationary-phase film thickness primarily:
- Increases retention of volatile analytes and can improve early-peak resolution
- Decreases retention of high boilers
- Eliminates the need for temperature programming
- Reduces selectivity for structural isomers
Correct Answer: Increases retention of volatile analytes and can improve early-peak resolution
Q17. For two nearly coeluting peaks (α = 1.03), which strategy provides the largest improvement in resolution for the same analysis time?
- Changing the mobile phase to increase α slightly
- Doubling the column length
- Increasing flow rate to reduce analysis time
- Increasing injection volume to boost signal
Correct Answer: Changing the mobile phase to increase α slightly
Q18. Under a fixed maximum pressure limit in UHPLC, which action can improve resolution without exceeding the pressure cap?
- Raise column temperature to lower solvent viscosity
- Increase flow rate at the same temperature
- Use smaller particles without other changes
- Install a longer column of the same particle size immediately
Correct Answer: Raise column temperature to lower solvent viscosity
Q19. Using a detector time constant or data rate that is too slow relative to peak width will:
- Broaden peaks and reduce apparent resolution
- Sharpen peaks but increase noise
- Have no effect on resolution
- Improve selectivity between closely eluting peaks
Correct Answer: Broaden peaks and reduce apparent resolution
Q20. In UV-Vis, to resolve two absorbance bands separated by ~1 nm, the most effective adjustment is to:
- Narrow the spectral bandwidth (slit width)
- Increase cuvette pathlength
- Raise detector voltage only
- Use a quartz cuvette instead of glass in the visible region
Correct Answer: Narrow the spectral bandwidth (slit width)

I am a Registered Pharmacist under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, and the founder of PharmacyFreak.com. I hold a Bachelor of Pharmacy degree from Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Science and Research. With a strong academic foundation and practical knowledge, I am committed to providing accurate, easy-to-understand content to support pharmacy students and professionals. My aim is to make complex pharmaceutical concepts accessible and useful for real-world application.
Mail- Sachin@pharmacyfreak.com

